osf.io speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 14:42 UTC. Grade D (62/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://osf.io/

20 October 2026 at 14:42 UTC · Free test · report pt_043d2ecfe19c
Grade
D
62/100
Performance56/100
Structure71/100

11 audit(s) passed, 5 need work

First byte (TTFB)1.50 smeasured from this server
Fully loaded2.09 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests7document + assets
Page weight1.65 MBcompressed transfer
HTML document1.3 KBbr
ProtocolHTTP/2server not sent

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 55 ms 4%
  • TCP connect 1.11 s 74%
  • Server wait 337 ms 23%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 95% of 4,999 pages tested here1.50 s against a median of 448 ms
Page weightheavier than 77% of 4,999 pages tested here1.65 MB against a median of 650.3 KB
Fully loadedslower than 60% of 4,999 pages tested here2.09 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 91% of 4,999 pages tested here7 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 1.50 s. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 1.65 MB over 7 request(s), which is lean. Javascript files are 96% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives br-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/2, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The main thread was blocked for 501 ms, so taps and scrolling wait while scripts run.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of osf.io
Mobile 390 × 844 · 4.4 KB · page is 844 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paintnot reportedgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time501 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint3.12 sfirst content on screen
Browser page weight1.93 MB75 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paintnot reported
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time501 ms
Needs improvementgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 4 requests
1.58 MB 96%
Css 1 request
53.5 KB 3%
Images 1 request
15.0 KB 1%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 7 request(s) in total, 1.65 MB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 1496 ms. Of that, 337 ms was the server thinking and 1160 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Render-blocking resources

high impact

3 render-blocking resource(s) in the document head (1 script(s), 2 stylesheet(s)). The page cannot paint until each one arrives.

Fix: Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Total page weight

high impact

The page transfers 1.65 MB across 7 request(s), with the document itself at 1.3 KB.

Fix: Work through the heaviest assets first: images, then fonts, then third-party scripts.

Cache static assets

medium impact

6 asset(s) answer without a Cache-Control max-age, so browsers revalidate them on every visit.

Fix: Version filenames on change and serve them with a long max-age plus immutable. That is what makes a returning visitor fast.

JavaScript weight

medium impact

1 JavaScript file(s) over 200 KB: main-WBMFHEYO.js (1.42 MB)

Fix: Split routes, remove unused dependencies, and prefer a two-file build (one pinned library, one application bundle) over many small ones.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

JAVASCRIPTosf.io/main-WBMFHEYO.js
593 ms
JAVASCRIPTosf.io/scripts-O6FZJ6YQ.js
490 ms
JAVASCRIPTosf.io/assets/js/newrelic/newrelic.snippet.js
455 ms
JAVASCRIPTosf.io/assets/ace-builds/ace.js
450 ms
CSSosf.io/styles-KRTEHDKY.css
450 ms
IMAGESosf.io/favicon.ico
420 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://osf.io/main-WBMFHEYO.jsjavascript200593 ms1.42 MB
https://osf.io/scripts-O6FZJ6YQ.jsjavascript200490 ms24.3 KB
https://osf.io/assets/js/newrelic/newrelic.snippet.jsjavascript200455 ms25.2 KB
https://osf.io/assets/ace-builds/ace.jsjavascript200450 ms114.1 KB
https://osf.io/styles-KRTEHDKY.csscss200450 ms53.5 KB
https://osf.io/favicon.icoimages200420 ms15.0 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.