405kk.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 15:19 UTC. Grade A (91/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://405kk.com/

20 October 2026 at 15:19 UTC · Free test · report pt_183ce491efbb
Grade
A
91/100
Performance89/100
Structure95/100

15 audit(s) passed, 1 need work

First byte (TTFB)624 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded624 msfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests2document + assets
Page weight2.7 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document2.7 KBgzip
ProtocolHTTP/3nginx

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 77 ms 12%
  • TCP connect 173 ms 28%
  • Server wait 374 ms 60%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 65% of 4,999 pages tested here624 ms against a median of 448 ms
Page weightlighter than 97% of 4,999 pages tested here2.7 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 97% of 4,999 pages tested here624 ms against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 96% of 4,999 pages tested here2 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 624 ms. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 2.7 KB over 2 request(s), which is lean.
  • The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 700 ms, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • The main thread was blocked for 15 ms in total, which is not enough to feel.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Desktop screenshot of 405kk.com
Desktop 1366 × 768 · 95.0 KB · page is 1751 px tall
Mobile screenshot of 405kk.com
Mobile 390 × 844 · 67.6 KB · page is 2244 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint700 msgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time15 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint700 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight2.8 KB1 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paint700 ms
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time15 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 2 request(s) in total, 2.7 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 624 ms. Of that, 374 ms was the server thinking and 250 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Waterfall

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://405kk.com/subjectEncoded, bodyEncodedother00 ms0 B
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.