abema.tv speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 15:01 UTC. Grade C (76/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://abema.tv/

20 October 2026 at 15:01 UTC · Free test · report pt_248d88a0883e
Grade
C
76/100
Performance69/100
Structure86/100

14 audit(s) passed, 2 need work

First byte (TTFB)1.37 smeasured from this server
Fully loaded1.37 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests1document + assets
Page weight30.8 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document30.8 KBno compression
ProtocolHTTP/3Varnish

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 109 ms 8%
  • TCP connect 33 ms 2%
  • Server wait 1.23 s 90%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 94% of 4,999 pages tested here1.37 s against a median of 448 ms
Page weightlighter than 93% of 4,999 pages tested here30.8 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 79% of 4,999 pages tested here1.37 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 98% of 4,999 pages tested here1 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 1.37 s. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 30.8 KB over 1 request(s), which is lean.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 720 ms, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • The main thread was blocked for 6 ms in total, which is not enough to feel.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of abema.tv
Mobile 390 × 844 · 21.0 KB · page is 844 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint720 msgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time6 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint720 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight31.5 KB1 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paint720 ms
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time6 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 1370 ms. Of that, 1228 ms was the server thinking and 142 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Compress text responses

high impact

0 text response(s) of 10 KB or more are sent uncompressed, and the document itself is compressed. That is 0 B of compressible text.

Fix: Turn on brotli (preferred) or gzip for text/css, javascript and text/html in the web server. This is the cheapest win available on almost any site.

Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.