www.ixigua.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 13:47 UTC. Grade C (75/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://www.ixigua.com/

20 October 2026 at 13:47 UTC · Free test · report pt_2e8a3d426693
Grade
C
75/100
Performance70/100
Structure83/100

12 audit(s) passed, 4 need work

First byte (TTFB)1.17 smeasured from this server
Fully loaded2.63 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests6document + assets
Page weight147.2 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document2.7 KBgzip
ProtocolHTTP/3Tengine
Third-party144.5 KBother hosts

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 789 ms 67%
  • TCP connect 51 ms 4%
  • Server wait 330 ms 28%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 90% of 4,999 pages tested here1.17 s against a median of 448 ms
Page weightlighter than 84% of 4,999 pages tested here147.2 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedslower than 76% of 4,999 pages tested here2.63 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 92% of 4,999 pages tested here6 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 1.17 s. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 147.2 KB over 6 request(s), which is lean. Javascript files are 95% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • 98% of the weight comes from other hosts (analytics, fonts, embeds), which also means their slow day becomes your slow day.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of www.ixigua.com
Mobile 390 × 844 · 2.7 KB · page is 844 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paintnot reportedgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking timenone over 50 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paintnot reportedfirst content on screen
Browser page weight859.5 KB39 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paintnot reported
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking timenone over 50 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 3 requests
140.3 KB 95%
Images 1 request
4.2 KB 3%
Other 1 request
18 B 0%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 6 request(s) in total, 147.2 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 1170 ms. Of that, 330 ms was the server thinking and 840 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Avoid extra redirects

medium impact

1 redirect hop(s) before the page load started, each one a full round trip before the first byte.

Fix: Link to the canonical URL (and make sure http, the apex domain and www all point at it) so no visitor pays a redirect first.

Mobile viewport

medium impact

No viewport meta tag, so a phone renders the desktop layout scaled down.

Fix: Add a viewport meta tag with width=device-width and an initial scale of 1.

Third-party weight

low impact

5 third-party host(s) serve 144.5 KB of this page. Each one is another DNS lookup, TLS handshake and point of failure you do not control.

Fix: Self-host the libraries you can, drop the tags you cannot justify, and preconnect the ones you keep.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

JAVASCRIPTlf-c-flwb.bytetos.com/obj/rc-client-security/c-webmssdk/1.0.…
1.46 s
IMAGESsf1-cdn-tos.douyinstatic.com/obj/eden-cn/lpqpflo/ixigua_favicon.ico
1.37 s
OTHERprivacy.zijieapi.com/api/web-cmp/sdk/
1.17 s
JAVASCRIPTlf-cdn-tos.bytescm.com/obj/static/secsdk/secsdk-lastest.umd.js
656 ms
JAVASCRIPTunpkg.byted-static.com/byted-ucenter/ttwid-js/1.0.1/dist/inde…
600 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://lf-c-flwb.bytetos.com/obj/rc-client-security/c-webmssdk/1.0.0.15/webmssdk.js 3rd partyjavascript2001.46 s70.6 KB
https://sf1-cdn-tos.douyinstatic.com/obj/eden-cn/lpqpflo/ixigua_favicon.ico 3rd partyimages2001.37 s4.2 KB
https://privacy.zijieapi.com/api/web-cmp/sdk/?project_key=b443652e7ef8089c 3rd partyother4041.17 s18 B
https://lf-cdn-tos.bytescm.com/obj/static/secsdk/secsdk-lastest.umd.js 3rd partyjavascript200656 ms43.6 KB
https://unpkg.byted-static.com/byted-ucenter/ttwid-js/1.0.1/dist/index.umd.production.js 3rd partyjavascript200600 ms26.0 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.