zeronaught.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 16:03 UTC. Grade A (92/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://zeronaught.com/

20 October 2026 at 16:03 UTC · Free test · report pt_331914e89f1e
Grade
A
92/100
Performance94/100
Structure89/100

13 audit(s) passed, 3 need work

First byte (TTFB)408 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded408 msfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests1document + assets
Page weight13 Bcompressed transfer
HTML document13 Bno compression
ProtocolHTTP/3Google Frontend

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 99 ms 24%
  • TCP connect 62 ms 15%
  • Server wait 246 ms 60%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First bytefaster than 55% of 4,999 pages tested here408 ms against a median of 449 ms
Page weightlighter than 100% of 4,999 pages tested here13 B against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 98% of 4,999 pages tested here408 ms against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 98% of 4,999 pages tested here1 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte arrived in 408 ms. That is workable, and the cheapest win left is caching or a warmer connection.
  • The page transfers 13 B over 1 request(s), which is lean.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 380 ms, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of zeronaught.com
Mobile 390 × 844 · 3.2 KB · page is 2121 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint380 msgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking timenone over 50 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint380 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight182 B1 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paint380 ms
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking timenone over 50 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 408 ms. Of that, 246 ms was the server thinking and 161 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Mobile viewport

medium impact

No viewport meta tag, so a phone renders the desktop layout scaled down.

Fix: Add a viewport meta tag with width=device-width and an initial scale of 1.

Strict-Transport-Security

low impact

HSTS is not set, so the first visit on a hostile network can still be downgraded to HTTP.

Fix: Send Strict-Transport-Security with a max-age of at least six months. Add includeSubDomains once every subdomain is HTTPS.

Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.