fingerprint.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 14:10 UTC. Grade A (93/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://fingerprint.com/

20 October 2026 at 14:10 UTC · Free test · report pt_3f872d6ef34f
Grade
A
93/100
Performance94/100
Structure91/100

13 audit(s) passed, 3 need work

First byte (TTFB)437 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded1.00 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests7document + assets
Page weight557.2 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document135.4 KBbr
ProtocolHTTP/3Vercel

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 64 ms 15%
  • TCP connect 74 ms 17%
  • Server wait 298 ms 68%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First bytefaster than 52% of 4,999 pages tested here437 ms against a median of 449 ms
Page weightlighter than 55% of 4,999 pages tested here557.2 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 92% of 4,999 pages tested here1.00 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 91% of 4,999 pages tested here7 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte arrived in 437 ms. That is workable, and the cheapest win left is caching or a warmer connection.
  • The page transfers 557.2 KB over 7 request(s), which is lean. Javascript files are 44% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives br-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 824 ms, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • Layout stayed still (CLS 0.001), so nothing jumps under the reader's cursor.
  • The main thread was blocked for 782 ms, so taps and scrolling wait while scripts run.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of fingerprint.com
Mobile 390 × 844 · 53.2 KB · page is 6000 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint824 msgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.001under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time782 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint824 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight1.34 MB35 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paint824 ms
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.001
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time782 ms
Poorgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 4 requests
245.8 KB 44%
Css 1 request
166.7 KB 30%
Images 1 request
9.3 KB 2%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 7 request(s) in total, 557.2 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 437 ms. Of that, 298 ms was the server thinking and 138 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

HTML document size

medium impact

The document transfers 135.4 KB. A bloated document delays every other request, because nothing else can start until it is parsed.

Fix: Paginate long listings, move repeated markup into a template, and stop inlining large data URIs into the HTML.

Avoid extra redirects

medium impact

1 redirect hop(s) before the page load started, each one a full round trip before the first byte.

Fix: Link to the canonical URL (and make sure http, the apex domain and www all point at it) so no visitor pays a redirect first.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

JAVASCRIPTfingerprint.com/polyfill-23972986c4de81d826ab.js
565 ms
IMAGESfingerprint.com/img/favicon.ico
430 ms
JAVASCRIPTfingerprint.com/app-4bfded1b85cdee76b153.js
395 ms
CSSfingerprint.com/styles.4cbda11f5ba2aa1ded81.css
386 ms
JAVASCRIPTfingerprint.com/webpack-runtime-4becfeb8b73a251b7788.js
386 ms
JAVASCRIPTfingerprint.com/framework-3a92ac1376e743c98853.js
383 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://fingerprint.com/polyfill-23972986c4de81d826ab.jsjavascript200565 ms42.2 KB
https://fingerprint.com/img/favicon.icoimages200430 ms9.3 KB
https://fingerprint.com/app-4bfded1b85cdee76b153.jsjavascript200395 ms139.3 KB
https://fingerprint.com/styles.4cbda11f5ba2aa1ded81.csscss200386 ms166.7 KB
https://fingerprint.com/webpack-runtime-4becfeb8b73a251b7788.jsjavascript200386 ms4.6 KB
https://fingerprint.com/framework-3a92ac1376e743c98853.jsjavascript200383 ms59.7 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.