www.marutisuzuki.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 16:08 UTC. Grade A (96/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://www.marutisuzuki.com/

20 October 2026 at 16:08 UTC · Free test · report pt_4295b0cfe9c9
Grade
A
96/100
Performance98/100
Structure94/100

14 audit(s) passed, 2 need work

First byte (TTFB)269 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded701 msfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests8document + assets
Page weight54.1 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document5.8 KBbr
ProtocolHTTP/3server not sent

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 104 ms 39%
  • TCP connect 44 ms 16%
  • Server wait 121 ms 45%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First bytefaster than 81% of 4,999 pages tested here269 ms against a median of 449 ms
Page weightlighter than 91% of 4,999 pages tested here54.1 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 96% of 4,999 pages tested here701 ms against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 90% of 4,999 pages tested here8 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte arrived in 269 ms. That is workable, and the cheapest win left is caching or a warmer connection.
  • The page transfers 54.1 KB over 8 request(s), which is lean. Javascript files are 70% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives br-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 1.56 s, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • Layout shift is 1.321 (good is under 0.1): something without a reserved size is loading late - an image, an ad, or a font swap.
  • The main thread was blocked for 275 ms, so taps and scrolling wait while scripts run.

Fix first: Render-blocking resources - Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of www.marutisuzuki.com
Mobile 390 × 844 · 253.0 KB · page is 4337 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint1.56 sgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift1.321under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time275 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint328 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight4.49 MB130 request(s), scripts included
Failed requests3blocked or unreachable
Largest contentful paint1.56 s
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift1.321
Poorgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time275 ms
Needs improvementgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 6 requests
37.8 KB 70%
Css 1 request
10.5 KB 19%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 8 request(s) in total, 54.1 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Render-blocking resources

high impact

5 render-blocking resource(s) in the document head (5 script(s), 0 stylesheet(s)). The page cannot paint until each one arrives.

Fix: Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Avoid extra redirects

medium impact

1 redirect hop(s) before the page load started, each one a full round trip before the first byte.

Fix: Link to the canonical URL (and make sure http, the apex domain and www all point at it) so no visitor pays a redirect first.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

CSSwww.marutisuzuki.com/styles/styles.css
432 ms
JAVASCRIPTwww.marutisuzuki.com/commons/utility/masterUtil.js
406 ms
JAVASCRIPTwww.marutisuzuki.com/commons/scripts/martech-loader.js
402 ms
JAVASCRIPTwww.marutisuzuki.com/scripts/init.js
373 ms
JAVASCRIPTwww.marutisuzuki.com/commons/plugins/martech/src/index.js
371 ms
JAVASCRIPTwww.marutisuzuki.com/commons/scripts/aem.js
352 ms
JAVASCRIPTwww.marutisuzuki.com/commons/scripts/scripts.js
349 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://www.marutisuzuki.com/styles/styles.csscss200432 ms10.5 KB
https://www.marutisuzuki.com/commons/utility/masterUtil.jsjavascript200406 ms14.5 KB
https://www.marutisuzuki.com/commons/scripts/martech-loader.jsjavascript200402 ms1011 B
https://www.marutisuzuki.com/scripts/init.jsjavascript200373 ms1.6 KB
https://www.marutisuzuki.com/commons/plugins/martech/src/index.jsjavascript200371 ms5.7 KB
https://www.marutisuzuki.com/commons/scripts/aem.jsjavascript200352 ms7.5 KB
https://www.marutisuzuki.com/commons/scripts/scripts.jsjavascript200349 ms7.5 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.