superuser.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 14:47 UTC. Grade A (95/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://superuser.com/

20 October 2026 at 14:47 UTC · Free test · report pt_51d2bd2a7ca5
Grade
A
95/100
Performance100/100
Structure88/100

14 audit(s) passed, 2 need work

First byte (TTFB)199 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded1.24 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests26document + assets
Page weight180.8 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document24.2 KBgzip
ProtocolHTTP/3cloudflare
Third-party80.1 KBother hosts

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 81 ms 41%
  • TCP connect 2 ms 1%
  • Server wait 116 ms 58%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First bytefaster than 93% of 4,999 pages tested here199 ms against a median of 449 ms
Page weightlighter than 81% of 4,999 pages tested here180.8 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 86% of 4,999 pages tested here1.24 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends more requests than 100% of 4,999 pages tested here26 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The server answered in 199 ms, which is fast: almost all of the wait is the page itself, not the host.
  • The page transfers 180.8 KB over 26 request(s). Javascript files are 77% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • 44% of the weight comes from other hosts (analytics, fonts, embeds), which also means their slow day becomes your slow day.
  • The largest element painted at 1.09 s, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • The main thread was blocked for 20 ms in total, which is not enough to feel.

Fix first: Render-blocking resources - Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of superuser.com
Mobile 390 × 844 · 30.1 KB · page is 844 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint1.09 sgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time20 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint692 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight976.4 KB59 request(s), scripts included
Failed requests2blocked or unreachable
Largest contentful paint1.09 s
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time20 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 11 requests
139.1 KB 77%
Images 14 requests
17.6 KB 10%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 26 request(s) in total, 180.8 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Render-blocking resources

high impact

10 render-blocking resource(s) in the document head (7 script(s), 3 stylesheet(s)). The page cannot paint until each one arrives.

Fix: Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Third-party weight

low impact

5 third-party host(s) serve 80.1 KB of this page. Each one is another DNS lookup, TLS handshake and point of failure you do not control.

Fix: Self-host the libraries you can, drop the tags you cannot justify, and preconnect the ones you keep.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

JAVASCRIPTajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.7.1/jquery.min.js
1.04 s
JAVASCRIPTsuperuser.com/Content/Js/home/index.en.js
994 ms
JAVASCRIPTsuperuser.com/Content/Js/stub.en.js
980 ms
IMAGESlh5.googleusercontent.com/-Uu7x9VeGPik/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAaI/j…
967 ms
JAVASCRIPTcdn.cookielaw.org/scripttemplates/otSDKStub.js
964 ms
JAVASCRIPTsuperuser.com/Content/Js/third-party/npm/@stackoverf…
959 ms
JAVASCRIPTcdn.cookielaw.org/scripttemplates/gpp.stub.js
937 ms
IMAGESsuperuser.com/Content/Img/stack-internal-left-tile-p…
932 ms
IMAGESsuperuser.com/Content/Img/stack-internal-left-tile-d…
932 ms
IMAGESsuperuser.com/Content/Sites/superuser/Img/logo.svg
932 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.7.1/jquery.min.js 3rd partyjavascript2001.04 s29.7 KB
https://superuser.com/Content/Js/home/index.en.js?v=38002111626ejavascript200994 ms14.0 KB
https://superuser.com/Content/Js/stub.en.js?v=c4a2a2be622djavascript200980 ms18.9 KB
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-Uu7x9VeGPik/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAaI/ja93OkXiICo/s32-rj/photo.jpg 3rd partyimages200967 ms1.6 KB
https://cdn.cookielaw.org/scripttemplates/otSDKStub.js 3rd partyjavascript200964 ms13.6 KB
https://superuser.com/Content/Js/third-party/npm/@stackoverflow/stacks/dist/js/stacks.min.js?v=79a2fd33ef4bjavascript200959 ms30.5 KB
https://cdn.cookielaw.org/scripttemplates/gpp.stub.js 3rd partyjavascript200937 ms27.7 KB
https://superuser.com/Content/Img/stack-internal-left-tile-pinned.svg?v=16878b0d76c5images200932 ms4.1 KB
https://superuser.com/Content/Img/stack-internal-left-tile-drawer.svg?v=0056d71cd7e6images200932 ms3.2 KB
https://superuser.com/Content/Sites/superuser/Img/logo.svg?v=4bc8a703ebacimages200932 ms1.3 KB
https://i.sstatic.net/Qsd1yfPn.png?s=32 3rd partyimages200932 ms1.1 KB
https://i.sstatic.net/2gL53FM6.png?s=32 3rd partyimages200932 ms672 B
https://i.sstatic.net/geyHC.png?s=32 3rd partyimages200932 ms661 B
https://i.sstatic.net/rE39odxk.png?s=32 3rd partyimages200932 ms544 B
https://superuser.com/Content/Js/google-analytics.en.js?v=48615a9a9bc4javascript200931 ms2.3 KB
https://superuser.com/Content/Js/webpack-chunks/5102.en.js?v=1e6c2976e394javascript200931 ms977 B
https://superuser.com/Content/Js/sprinkles/cookie-consent.en.js?v=7ee6963139c5javascript200931 ms815 B
https://i.sstatic.net/jGGVr.png?s=32 3rd partyimages200931 ms709 B
https://i.sstatic.net/5YzGh.jpg?s=32 3rd partyimages200931 ms683 B
https://superuser.com/px.js?ch=1javascript200931 ms270 B
https://superuser.com/px.js?ch=2javascript200930 ms270 B
https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/80ed78653c2fa3f32a57ba80e1d58301?s=32&d=identicon&r=PG&f=y&so-version=2 3rd partyimages200926 ms981 B
https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/0a36e0e06aa358f78cb865997b0d9eae?s=32&d=identicon&r=PG&f=y&so-version=2 3rd partyimages200925 ms896 B
https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/ab98e57b8f69df386d19fd0e8a0b34ff?s=32&d=identicon&r=PG&f=y&so-version=2 3rd partyimages200925 ms857 B
https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/a007be5a61f6aa8f3e85ae2fc18dd66e?s=32&d=identicon&r=PG 3rd partyimages200925 ms499 B
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.