cloud.tencent.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 12:55 UTC. Grade B (81/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://cloud.tencent.com/

20 October 2026 at 12:55 UTC · Free test · report pt_56af5f4204be
Grade
B
81/100
Performance80/100
Structure83/100

11 audit(s) passed, 5 need work

First byte (TTFB)860 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded2.14 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests14document + assets
Page weight634.3 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document59.7 KBgzip
ProtocolHTTP/3nginx
Third-party574.6 KBother hosts

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 203 ms 24%
  • TCP connect 63 ms 7%
  • Server wait 593 ms 69%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 79% of 4,999 pages tested here860 ms against a median of 448 ms
Page weightlighter than 51% of 4,999 pages tested here634.3 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedslower than 62% of 4,999 pages tested here2.14 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 84% of 4,999 pages tested here14 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 860 ms. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 634.3 KB over 14 request(s), which is lean. Javascript files are 76% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • 91% of the weight comes from other hosts (analytics, fonts, embeds), which also means their slow day becomes your slow day.
  • The largest element painted at 1.48 s, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • Layout stayed still (CLS 0.006), so nothing jumps under the reader's cursor.
  • The main thread was blocked for 454 ms, so taps and scrolling wait while scripts run.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of cloud.tencent.com
Mobile 390 × 844 · 134.7 KB · page is 6000 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint1.48 sgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.006under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time454 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint1.00 sfirst content on screen
Browser page weight6.09 MB226 request(s), scripts included
Failed requests3blocked or unreachable
Largest contentful paint1.48 s
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.006
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time454 ms
Needs improvementgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 7 requests
483.5 KB 76%
Css 3 requests
90.1 KB 14%
Images 1 request
949 B 0%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 14 request(s) in total, 634.3 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 860 ms. Of that, 593 ms was the server thinking and 266 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Render-blocking resources

high impact

6 render-blocking resource(s) in the document head (3 script(s), 3 stylesheet(s)). The page cannot paint until each one arrives.

Fix: Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Third-party weight

medium impact

2 third-party host(s) serve 574.6 KB of this page. Each one is another DNS lookup, TLS handshake and point of failure you do not control.

Fix: Self-host the libraries you can, drop the tags you cannot justify, and preconnect the ones you keep.

Avoid extra redirects

medium impact

1 redirect hop(s) before the page load started, each one a full round trip before the first byte.

Fix: Link to the canonical URL (and make sure http, the apex domain and www all point at it) so no visitor pays a redirect first.

Strict-Transport-Security

low impact

HSTS is not set, so the first visit on a hostile network can still be downgraded to HTTP.

Fix: Send Strict-Transport-Security with a max-age of at least six months. Add includeSubDomains once every subdomain is HTTPS.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

JAVASCRIPTcloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/portal/home/assets/polyfills-le…
1.28 s
HTMLcloud.tencent.com/t
1.09 s
HTMLcloud.tencent.com/n
1.09 s
JAVASCRIPTcdn-go.cn/tam/aegis-sdk/latest/aegis.f.min.js
858 ms
JAVASCRIPTcloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/main/scripts/release/common/bas…
813 ms
JAVASCRIPTcloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/main/scripts/release/common/dep…
813 ms
JAVASCRIPTcloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/main/scripts/release/common/ven…
813 ms
CSScloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/portal/kit/full.df73a28ab3829ca…
813 ms
IMAGEScloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/favicon.ico
813 ms
JAVASCRIPTcloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/portal/kit/full.daad6ae82.js
789 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://cloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/portal/home/assets/polyfills-legacy.e89f9c00.js 3rd partyjavascript2001.28 s39.3 KB
https://cloud.tencent.com/thtml4041.09 s0 B
https://cloud.tencent.com/nhtml4041.09 s0 B
https://cdn-go.cn/tam/aegis-sdk/latest/aegis.f.min.js 3rd partyjavascript200858 ms47.1 KB
https://cloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/main/scripts/release/common/base.2ca1f4943948247d79e9.js?max_age=31536000 3rd partyjavascript200813 ms80.2 KB
https://cloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/main/scripts/release/common/deps.6da264e652ff7f476e8c.js?max_age=31536000 3rd partyjavascript200813 ms38.6 KB
https://cloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/main/scripts/release/common/vendors/babel/polyfill.6.26.min.js?max-age=31536000 3rd partyjavascript200813 ms33.9 KB
https://cloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/portal/kit/full.df73a28ab3829ca0322a.css 3rd partycss200813 ms25.5 KB
https://cloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/favicon.ico?t=201902181234 3rd partyimages200813 ms949 B
https://cloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/portal/kit/full.daad6ae82.js 3rd partyjavascript200789 ms195.3 KB
https://cloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/portal/home/assets/index.ceacf371.js 3rd partyjavascript200760 ms49.0 KB
https://cloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/open_proj/proj_qcloud_v2/gateway/portal/css/base-20209142343.css?max_age=31536000&t=20191128 3rd partycss200760 ms35.6 KB
https://cloudcache.tencent-cloud.com/qcloud/ui/tpm-home/build/Main/Main-202608171547.css 3rd partycss200760 ms29.1 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.