www.goindigo.in speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 14:33 UTC. Grade E (59/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://www.goindigo.in:443/

20 October 2026 at 14:33 UTC · Free test · report pt_58d35d7b5a18

Re-test this page Test your own site

Grade

59/100

Performance53/100

Structure68/100

11 audit(s) passed, 5 need work

First byte (TTFB)267 msmeasured from this server

Fully loaded7.93 sfirst byte + slowest asset

Requests26document + assets

Page weight3.36 MBcompressed transfer

HTML document37.8 KBgzip

ProtocolHTTP/3server not sent

Where the first byte went

DNS lookup 56 ms 21%
TCP connect 35 ms 13%
Server wait 176 ms 66%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First bytefaster than 81% of 4,999 pages tested here267 ms against a median of 449 ms

Page weightheavier than 90% of 4,999 pages tested here3.36 MB against a median of 650.3 KB

Fully loadedslower than 98% of 4,999 pages tested here7.93 s against a median of 1.84 s

Requestssends more requests than 100% of 4,999 pages tested here26 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

The first byte arrived in 267 ms. That is workable, and the cheapest win left is caching or a warmer connection.
The page transfers 3.36 MB over 26 request(s). Images files are 99% of it, so resize and recompress the largest images before anything else.
The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.

Fix first: Image delivery and format - Serve WebP or AVIF with a JPEG fallback, size images to the space they occupy, and lazy-load anything below the fold. Images are usually more than half of a slow page.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

No screenshot for this report.

The headless browser did not capture this page when the test ran, so only the server measurements are shown.

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Images 25 requests

3.32 MB 99%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 26 request(s) in total, 3.36 MB across all of them.

Top issues

Image delivery and format

high impact

4 image(s) over 200 KB and 7 large image(s) still served as JPEG or PNG.

Fix: Serve WebP or AVIF with a JPEG fallback, size images to the space they occupy, and lazy-load anything below the fold. Images are usually more than half of a slow page.

Render-blocking resources

high impact

7 render-blocking resource(s) in the document head (1 script(s), 6 stylesheet(s)). The page cannot paint until each one arrives.

Fix: Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Total page weight

high impact

The page transfers 3.36 MB across 26 request(s), with the document itself at 37.8 KB.

Fix: Work through the heaviest assets first: images, then fonts, then third-party scripts.

Cache static assets

medium impact

10 asset(s) answer without a Cache-Control max-age, so browsers revalidate them on every visit.

Fix: Version filenames on change and serve them with a long max-age plus immutable. That is what makes a returning visitor fast.

Avoid extra redirects

medium impact

1 redirect hop(s) before the page load started, each one a full round trip before the first byte.

Fix: Link to the canonical URL (and make sure http, the apex domain and www all point at it) so no visitor pays a redirect first.