biglobe.ne.jp speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 14:03 UTC. Grade A (91/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://biglobe.ne.jp/

20 October 2026 at 14:03 UTC · Free test · report pt_6a029eb0f319
Grade
A
91/100
Performance90/100
Structure92/100

14 audit(s) passed, 2 need work

First byte (TTFB)571 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded571 msfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests1document + assets
Page weight254 Bcompressed transfer
HTML document254 Bno compression
ProtocolHTTP/3Apache

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 58 ms 10%
  • TCP connect 35 ms 6%
  • Server wait 479 ms 84%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 60% of 4,999 pages tested here571 ms against a median of 448 ms
Page weightlighter than 99% of 4,999 pages tested here254 B against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 97% of 4,999 pages tested here571 ms against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 98% of 4,999 pages tested here1 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 571 ms. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 254 B over 1 request(s), which is lean.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 1.01 s, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • Layout stayed still (CLS 0.009), so nothing jumps under the reader's cursor.
  • The main thread was blocked for 206 ms, so taps and scrolling wait while scripts run.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of biglobe.ne.jp
Mobile 390 × 844 · 308.2 KB · page is 6000 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint1.01 sgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.009under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time206 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint832 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight4.03 MB85 request(s), scripts included
Failed requests1blocked or unreachable
Largest contentful paint1.01 s
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.009
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time206 ms
Needs improvementgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 571 ms. Of that, 479 ms was the server thinking and 93 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Mobile viewport

medium impact

No viewport meta tag, so a phone renders the desktop layout scaled down.

Fix: Add a viewport meta tag with width=device-width and an initial scale of 1.

Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.