ico.org.uk speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 12:50 UTC. Grade D (69/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://ico.org.uk/

20 October 2026 at 12:50 UTC · Free test · report pt_6bff212a3a4e
Grade
D
69/100
Performance55/100
Structure91/100

15 audit(s) passed, 1 need work

First byte (TTFB)2.43 smeasured from this server
Fully loaded4.21 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests12document + assets
Page weight170.5 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document8.4 KBbr
ProtocolHTTP/3cloudflare
Third-party124.7 KBother hosts

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 73 ms 3%
  • TCP connect 26 ms 1%
  • Server wait 2.33 s 96%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 98% of 4,999 pages tested here2.43 s against a median of 448 ms
Page weightlighter than 82% of 4,999 pages tested here170.5 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedslower than 89% of 4,999 pages tested here4.21 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 86% of 4,999 pages tested here12 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 2.43 s. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 170.5 KB over 12 request(s), which is lean. Javascript files are 80% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives br-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • 73% of the weight comes from other hosts (analytics, fonts, embeds), which also means their slow day becomes your slow day.
  • The largest element painted at 1.10 s, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • Layout shift is 0.110 (good is under 0.1): something without a reserved size is loading late - an image, an ad, or a font swap.
  • The main thread was blocked for 18 ms in total, which is not enough to feel.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint1.10 sgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.110under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time18 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint920 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight274.2 KB24 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paint1.10 s
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.110
Needs improvementgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time18 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 2 requests
136.8 KB 80%
Css 1 request
20.9 KB 12%
Images 8 requests
4.5 KB 3%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 12 request(s) in total, 170.5 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 2428 ms. Of that, 2329 ms was the server thinking and 99 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

CSSico.org.uk/css/site.css
1.78 s
JAVASCRIPTico.org.uk/js/index.js
1.41 s
IMAGESico.org.uk/media2/g2nhkyjv/facebook.svg
1.41 s
IMAGESico.org.uk/media2/0usjoz4z/ico-header-logo-2026.svg
1.32 s
IMAGESico.org.uk/media2/qkcg1rdf/logo-small.svg
1.31 s
IMAGESico.org.uk/media2/cgdpvn4n/linkedin.svg
1.29 s
IMAGESico.org.uk/media2/3e3molj2/x-logo-1.svg
1.28 s
IMAGESico.org.uk/media2/z3vdkkxj/youtube.svg
1.27 s
IMAGESico.org.uk/media2/lhphq55z/favicon.ico
1.25 s
JAVASCRIPTcc.cdn.civiccomputing.com/9/cookieControl-9.11.min.js
733 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://ico.org.uk/css/site.css?v=0MCHJLz1mLyP9Mf9JU-lmpw9JsNIPZLjVUwbmWztk1Mcss2001.78 s20.9 KB
https://ico.org.uk/js/index.js?v=UJFv7RSenKNL2I8oYG-0zOiZdwn6GqOTdlv5A102NDkjavascript2001.41 s12.1 KB
https://ico.org.uk/media2/g2nhkyjv/facebook.svg?width=24&height=24&v=1db03b86b4b62d0images2001.41 s493 B
https://ico.org.uk/media2/0usjoz4z/ico-header-logo-2026.svg?width=160&height=96&v=1dd4218f9e89300images2001.32 s638 B
https://ico.org.uk/media2/qkcg1rdf/logo-small.svg?width=80&height=32&v=1db03b868bf60c0images2001.31 s778 B
https://ico.org.uk/media2/cgdpvn4n/linkedin.svg?width=24&height=24&v=1db042ab2dda7d0images2001.29 s592 B
https://ico.org.uk/media2/3e3molj2/x-logo-1.svg?width=24&height=24&v=1db7d782a8d9170images2001.28 s334 B
https://ico.org.uk/media2/z3vdkkxj/youtube.svg?width=24&height=24&v=1db042ab32beee0images2001.27 s618 B
https://ico.org.uk/media2/lhphq55z/favicon.icoimages2001.25 s743 B
https://cc.cdn.civiccomputing.com/9/cookieControl-9.11.min.js 3rd partyjavascript200733 ms124.7 KB
https://ico.org.uk/media2/r34b3hma/ogl.png?width=40&height=16&v=1dc6f3b2af11af0images200575 ms442 B
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.