anota.ai speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 15:11 UTC. Grade E (50/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://anota.ai/

20 October 2026 at 15:11 UTC · Free test · report pt_78f27bad8fb5
Grade
E
50/100
Performance39/100
Structure67/100

10 audit(s) passed, 6 need work

First byte (TTFB)5.63 smeasured from this server
Fully loaded15.78 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests26document + assets
Page weight965.4 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document12.1 KBbr
ProtocolHTTP/3cloudflare
Third-party58.0 KBother hosts

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 5.17 s 92%
  • TCP connect 26 ms 0%
  • Server wait 430 ms 8%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 99% of 4,999 pages tested here5.63 s against a median of 448 ms
Page weightheavier than 61% of 4,999 pages tested here965.4 KB against a median of 650.3 KB
Fully loadedslower than 100% of 4,999 pages tested here15.78 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends more requests than 100% of 4,999 pages tested here26 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 5.63 s. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 965.4 KB over 26 request(s). Images files are 84% of it, so resize and recompress the largest images before anything else.
  • The HTML itself arrives br-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

No screenshot for this report.

The headless browser did not capture this page when the test ran, so only the server measurements are shown.

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Images 14 requests
806.8 KB 84%
Html 3 requests
82.2 KB 9%
Javascript 4 requests
59.3 KB 6%
Css 3 requests
5.0 KB 1%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 26 request(s) in total, 965.4 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 5629 ms. Of that, 430 ms was the server thinking and 5199 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Compress text responses

high impact

1 text response(s) of 10 KB or more are sent uncompressed, and the document itself is not compressed. That is 58.0 KB of compressible text.

Fix: Turn on brotli (preferred) or gzip for text/css, javascript and text/html in the web server. This is the cheapest win available on almost any site.

Image delivery and format

high impact

2 image(s) over 200 KB and 0 large image(s) still served as JPEG or PNG.

Fix: Serve WebP or AVIF with a JPEG fallback, size images to the space they occupy, and lazy-load anything below the fold. Images are usually more than half of a slow page.

Render-blocking resources

high impact

4 render-blocking resource(s) in the document head (0 script(s), 4 stylesheet(s)). The page cannot paint until each one arrives.

Fix: Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Total page weight

medium impact

The page transfers 965.4 KB across 26 request(s), with the document itself at 12.1 KB.

Fix: Work through the heaviest assets first: images, then fonts, then third-party scripts.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

OTHERwww.googletagmanager.com/ns.html
10.16 s
IMAGESanota.ai/astro-content/logo.svg
10.14 s
IMAGESanota.ai/astro-content/testimonial-bg-2.svg
10.14 s
IMAGESanota.ai/astro-content/testimonial-bg-1.svg
10.14 s
IMAGESanota.ai/astro-content/canais-mockup.svg
10.14 s
IMAGESanota.ai/astro-content/google-logo.svg
10.14 s
JAVASCRIPTanota.ai/_astro/BaseLayout.astro_astro_type_scr…
10.14 s
IMAGESanota.ai/astro-content/footer-logo.svg
10.14 s
IMAGESanota.ai/astro-content/logo-scroll-5.svg
10.14 s
IMAGESanota.ai/astro-content/ifood-logo.svg
10.14 s

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-KKZMV4WJ 3rd partyother010.16 s0 B
https://anota.ai/astro-content/logo.svgimages010.14 s0 B
https://anota.ai/astro-content/testimonial-bg-2.svgimages010.14 s0 B
https://anota.ai/astro-content/testimonial-bg-1.svgimages010.14 s0 B
https://anota.ai/astro-content/canais-mockup.svgimages20010.14 s494.8 KB
https://anota.ai/astro-content/google-logo.svgimages20010.14 s234.4 KB
https://anota.ai/_astro/BaseLayout.astro_astro_type_script_index_0_lang.BCrRRVdm.jsjavascript20010.14 s58.3 KB
https://anota.ai/astro-content/footer-logo.svgimages20010.14 s15.4 KB
https://anota.ai/astro-content/logo-scroll-5.svgimages20010.14 s10.4 KB
https://anota.ai/astro-content/ifood-logo.svgimages20010.14 s783 B
https://anota.ai/_astro/FooterSection.astro_astro_type_script_index_0_lang.B1jRBzti.jsjavascript20010.14 s356 B
https://anota.ai/_astro/LiveChatFab.astro_astro_type_script_index_0_lang.DGWFjmRZ.jsjavascript20010.14 s352 B
https://anota.ai/_astro/index.astro_astro_type_script_index_0_lang.W-GRNy7I.jsjavascript20010.14 s334 B
https://anota.ai/astro-content/testimonial-bg-3.svgimages010.14 s0 B
https://anota.ai/thtml20010.14 s12.1 KB
https://anota.ai/ehtml20010.14 s12.1 KB
https://anota.ai/_astro/index.BQKUySjP.csscss20010.14 s2.9 KB
https://anota.ai/_astro/FAQSection.BuE1lABZ.csscss20010.14 s2.1 KB
https://anota.ai/astro-content/logo-scroll-2.svgimages2005.03 s15.5 KB
https://anota.ai/astro-content/logo-scroll-4.svgimages2005.03 s14.9 KB
https://anota.ai/astro-content/logo-scroll-3.svgimages2005.03 s12.2 KB
https://anota.ai/astro-content/logo-scroll-1.svgimages2005.03 s6.6 KB
https://www.youtube.com/embed/tCjx2h-zvIU 3rd partyhtml200911 ms58.0 KB
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Roboto:wght@400;500;600;700&display=swap 3rd partycss200894 ms0 B
https://anota.ai/astro-content/favicon.svgimages200757 ms1.8 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.