sweb.ru speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 12:59 UTC. Grade C (70/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://sweb.ru/

20 October 2026 at 12:59 UTC · Free test · report pt_7ca600aaf5fe
Grade
C
70/100
Performance60/100
Structure86/100

14 audit(s) passed, 2 need work

First byte (TTFB)742 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded10.85 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests26document + assets
Page weight38.1 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document33.4 KBgzip
ProtocolHTTP/3ddos-guard

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 50 ms 7%
  • TCP connect 160 ms 22%
  • Server wait 532 ms 72%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 72% of 4,999 pages tested here742 ms against a median of 448 ms
Page weightlighter than 92% of 4,999 pages tested here38.1 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedslower than 99% of 4,999 pages tested here10.85 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends more requests than 100% of 4,999 pages tested here26 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 742 ms. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 38.1 KB over 26 request(s).
  • The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

No screenshot for this report.

The headless browser did not capture this page when the test ran, so only the server measurements are shown.

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 15 requests
4.8 KB 12%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 26 request(s) in total, 38.1 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 742 ms. Of that, 532 ms was the server thinking and 210 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Render-blocking resources

high impact

9 render-blocking resource(s) in the document head (0 script(s), 9 stylesheet(s)). The page cannot paint until each one arrives.

Fix: Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

OTHERtop-fwz1.mail.ru/counter
10.11 s
JAVASCRIPTsweb.ru/scripts/vendor/modernizr.min.js
10.11 s
JAVASCRIPTsweb.ru/scripts/vendor/modernizr-webp.min.js
10.11 s
JAVASCRIPTsweb.ru/scripts/vendor/imask.min.js
10.11 s
JAVASCRIPTsweb.ru/scripts/vendor/jquery-3.7.1.min.js
10.11 s
JAVASCRIPTsweb.ru/scripts/vendor/common.min.js
10.11 s
JAVASCRIPTsweb.ru/scripts/vendor/jquery-ui.tooltip.min.js
10.11 s
JAVASCRIPTsweb.ru/scripts/vendor/jquery.ui.touch-punch.m…
10.11 s
JAVASCRIPTsweb.ru/scripts/vendor/lazyload.polyfill.min.js
10.11 s
JAVASCRIPTsweb.ru/scripts/vendor/swiper.min.js
10.11 s

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://top-fwz1.mail.ru/counter?id=3342951;js=na 3rd partyother010.11 s0 B
https://sweb.ru/scripts/vendor/modernizr.min.jsjavascript010.11 s0 B
https://sweb.ru/scripts/vendor/modernizr-webp.min.jsjavascript010.11 s0 B
https://sweb.ru/scripts/vendor/imask.min.jsjavascript010.11 s0 B
https://sweb.ru/scripts/vendor/jquery-3.7.1.min.jsjavascript010.11 s0 B
https://sweb.ru/scripts/vendor/common.min.js?nc=2026101902javascript010.11 s0 B
https://sweb.ru/scripts/vendor/jquery-ui.tooltip.min.jsjavascript010.11 s0 B
https://sweb.ru/scripts/vendor/jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.jsjavascript010.11 s0 B
https://sweb.ru/scripts/vendor/lazyload.polyfill.min.jsjavascript010.11 s0 B
https://sweb.ru/scripts/vendor/swiper.min.jsjavascript010.11 s0 B
https://sweb.ru/scripts/metrics-utils.min.js?nc=2026101902javascript010.11 s0 B
https://sweb.ru/scripts/menu.min.js?nc=2026101902javascript010.11 s0 B
https://sweb.ru/scripts/main.min.js?nc=2026101902javascript010.11 s0 B
https://mc.yandex.ru/watch/13740679 3rd partyother010.11 s0 B
https://s.sweb.ru/img/icons/country_flags/3x2/RU.svg 3rd partyimages010.11 s0 B
https://s.sweb.ru/img/img-common/panel-screens/vh/abb-vh-dark.png 3rd partyimages010.10 s0 B
https://s.sweb.ru/img/img-common/panel-screens/vh/adapt-vh.png 3rd partyimages010.10 s0 B
https://s.sweb.ru/img/img-common/panel-screens/vh/perform-vh-dark.png 3rd partyimages010.10 s0 B
https://sweb.ru/images/feedback-card-logo.svgimages010.10 s0 B
https://s.sweb.ru/img/img-common/panel-screens/vh/interface-vh.png 3rd partyimages010.10 s0 B
https://s.sweb.ru/img/icons/sw_new_blue-white_360.svg 3rd partyimages010.10 s0 B
https://s.sweb.ru/img/icons/sw_new_blue-white.svg 3rd partyimages010.09 s0 B
https://sweb.ru/scripts/specific-inputs.min.js?nc=2026101902javascript20010.09 s3.5 KB
https://sweb.ru/scripts/reusable/input-field.min.js?nc=2026101902javascript200793 ms729 B
https://sweb.ru/scripts/cookieBanner.min.js?nc=2026101902javascript200766 ms561 B
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.