www.dw.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 12:45 UTC. Grade A (97/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://www.dw.com/

20 October 2026 at 12:45 UTC · Free test · report pt_84aa664065d4
Grade
A
97/100
Performance99/100
Structure95/100

14 audit(s) passed, 2 need work

First byte (TTFB)235 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded1.03 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests16document + assets
Page weight584.7 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document4.4 KBgzip
ProtocolHTTP/3server not sent

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 56 ms 24%
  • TCP connect 40 ms 17%
  • Server wait 139 ms 59%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First bytefaster than 87% of 4,999 pages tested here235 ms against a median of 449 ms
Page weightlighter than 53% of 4,999 pages tested here584.7 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 91% of 4,999 pages tested here1.03 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 83% of 4,999 pages tested here16 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte arrived in 235 ms. That is workable, and the cheapest win left is caching or a warmer connection.
  • The page transfers 584.7 KB over 16 request(s). Javascript files are 55% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 1.18 s, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • The main thread was blocked for 105 ms in total, which is not enough to feel.

Fix first: JavaScript weight - Split routes, remove unused dependencies, and prefer a two-file build (one pinned library, one application bundle) over many small ones.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of www.dw.com
Mobile 390 × 844 · 239.0 KB · page is 6000 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint1.18 sgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time105 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint540 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight794.2 KB38 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paint1.18 s
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time105 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 1 request
319.2 KB 55%
Fonts 6 requests
193.0 KB 33%
Images 7 requests
48.2 KB 8%
Css 1 request
20.0 KB 3%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 16 request(s) in total, 584.7 KB across all of them.

Top issues

JavaScript weight

medium impact

1 JavaScript file(s) over 200 KB: index-8kUqjrvc.js (319.2 KB)

Fix: Split routes, remove unused dependencies, and prefer a two-file build (one pinned library, one application bundle) over many small ones.

Avoid extra redirects

medium impact

1 redirect hop(s) before the page load started, each one a full round trip before the first byte.

Fix: Link to the canonical URL (and make sure http, the apex domain and www all point at it) so no visitor pays a redirect first.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

FONTSwww.dw.com/static/DWPangeaLatinBasicLettersVAR-BZ…
799 ms
CSSwww.dw.com/static/index-yCZerUUT.css
699 ms
FONTSwww.dw.com/static/DWPangeaLatinExtendedVAR-CtY70A…
685 ms
FONTSwww.dw.com/static/DWPangeaArabicVAR-O-nkFhVK.woff2
676 ms
IMAGESwww.dw.com/images/icons/favicon-180x180.png
668 ms
IMAGESwww.dw.com/images/icons/favicon-152x152.png
668 ms
IMAGESwww.dw.com/images/icons/favicon-16x16.png
667 ms
IMAGESwww.dw.com/images/icons/favicon-167x167.png
663 ms
FONTSwww.dw.com/static/DWPangeaLatinBasicSymbolsVAR-yL…
662 ms
FONTSwww.dw.com/static/DWPangeaGreekVAR-DmYky3OT.woff2
661 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://www.dw.com/static/DWPangeaLatinBasicLettersVAR-BZ-2Srmb.woff2fonts200799 ms19.6 KB
https://www.dw.com/static/index-yCZerUUT.csscss200699 ms20.0 KB
https://www.dw.com/static/DWPangeaLatinExtendedVAR-CtY70AA3.woff2fonts200685 ms58.0 KB
https://www.dw.com/static/DWPangeaArabicVAR-O-nkFhVK.woff2fonts200676 ms30.1 KB
https://www.dw.com/images/icons/favicon-180x180.pngimages200668 ms12.1 KB
https://www.dw.com/images/icons/favicon-152x152.pngimages200668 ms9.9 KB
https://www.dw.com/images/icons/favicon-16x16.pngimages200667 ms546 B
https://www.dw.com/images/icons/favicon-167x167.pngimages200663 ms11.1 KB
https://www.dw.com/static/DWPangeaLatinBasicSymbolsVAR-yLfzKTDH.woff2fonts200662 ms16.5 KB
https://www.dw.com/static/DWPangeaGreekVAR-DmYky3OT.woff2fonts200661 ms24.7 KB
https://www.dw.com/images/icons/favicon-96x96.pngimages200657 ms5.8 KB
https://www.dw.com/images/icons/favicon-120x120.pngimages200655 ms7.4 KB
https://www.dw.com/static/DWPangeaCyrillicVAR-18hieSmg.woff2fonts200654 ms44.1 KB
https://www.dw.com/static/index-8kUqjrvc.jsjavascript200653 ms319.2 KB
https://www.dw.com/images/icons/favicon-32x32.pngimages200651 ms1.3 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.