site.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 12:47 UTC. Grade A (93/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://site.com/

20 October 2026 at 12:47 UTC · Free test · report pt_979efa8c6e3d
Grade
A
93/100
Performance94/100
Structure92/100

14 audit(s) passed, 2 need work

First byte (TTFB)414 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded1.09 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests3document + assets
Page weight1.8 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document453 Bgzip
ProtocolHTTP/3sfdcedge

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 56 ms 14%
  • TCP connect 71 ms 17%
  • Server wait 287 ms 69%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First bytefaster than 54% of 4,999 pages tested here414 ms against a median of 449 ms
Page weightlighter than 97% of 4,999 pages tested here1.8 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 90% of 4,999 pages tested here1.09 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 95% of 4,999 pages tested here3 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte arrived in 414 ms. That is workable, and the cheapest win left is caching or a warmer connection.
  • The page transfers 1.8 KB over 3 request(s), which is lean. Javascript files are 76% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 152 ms, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of site.com
Mobile 390 × 844 · 7.8 KB · page is 2121 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint152 msgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking timenone over 50 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint152 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight4.5 KB4 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paint152 ms
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking timenone over 50 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 2 requests
1.4 KB 76%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 3 request(s) in total, 1.8 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 414 ms. Of that, 287 ms was the server thinking and 127 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Mobile viewport

medium impact

No viewport meta tag, so a phone renders the desktop layout scaled down.

Fix: Add a viewport meta tag with width=device-width and an initial scale of 1.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

JAVASCRIPTsite.com/jslibrary/1746634854264/sfdc/IframeThi…
674 ms
JAVASCRIPTsite.com/static/111213/js/perf/stub.js
633 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://site.com/jslibrary/1746634854264/sfdc/IframeThirdPartyContextLogging.jsjavascript200674 ms817 B
https://site.com/static/111213/js/perf/stub.jsjavascript200633 ms618 B
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.