www.vizio.com/en/home speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 14:07 UTC. Grade A (93/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://www.vizio.com/en/home

20 October 2026 at 14:07 UTC · Free test · report pt_9eadff47713d

Re-test this page Test your own site

Grade

93/100

Performance97/100

Structure88/100

14 audit(s) passed, 2 need work

First byte (TTFB)292 msmeasured from this server

Fully loaded1.63 sfirst byte + slowest asset

Requests26document + assets

Page weight25.3 KBcompressed transfer

HTML document25.3 KBgzip

ProtocolHTTP/3cloudflare

Where the first byte went

DNS lookup 79 ms 27%
TCP connect 45 ms 15%
Server wait 168 ms 58%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First bytefaster than 76% of 4,999 pages tested here292 ms against a median of 449 ms

Page weightlighter than 93% of 4,999 pages tested here25.3 KB against a median of 650.5 KB

Fully loadedfaster than 62% of 4,999 pages tested here1.63 s against a median of 1.84 s

Requestssends more requests than 100% of 4,999 pages tested here26 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

The first byte arrived in 292 ms. That is workable, and the cheapest win left is caching or a warmer connection.
The page transfers 25.3 KB over 26 request(s).
The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
The largest element painted at 1.06 s, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
Layout stayed still (CLS 0.002), so nothing jumps under the reader's cursor.
The main thread was blocked for 245 ms, so taps and scrolling wait while scripts run.

Fix first: Render-blocking resources - Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of www.vizio.com — **Mobile** 390 × 844 · 113.2 KB · page is 6000 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint1.06 sgood is under 2.5 s

Cumulative layout shift0.002under 0.1 is stable

Total blocking time245 mslong tasks during load

First contentful paint616 msfirst content on screen

Browser page weight13.60 MB131 request(s), scripts included

Largest contentful paint1.06 s

Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s

Cumulative layout shift0.002

Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25

Total blocking time245 ms

Needs improvementgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Html 25 requests

25 B 0%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 26 request(s) in total, 25.3 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Render-blocking resources

high impact

8 render-blocking resource(s) in the document head (3 script(s), 5 stylesheet(s)). The page cannot paint until each one arrives.

Fix: Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Avoid extra redirects

medium impact

2 redirect hop(s) before the page load started, each one a full round trip before the first byte.

Fix: Link to the canonical URL (and make sure http, the apex domain and www all point at it) so no visitor pays a redirect first.