www.wps.cn speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 12:56 UTC. Grade D (69/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://www.wps.cn/

20 October 2026 at 12:56 UTC · Free test · report pt_a2cef01e3e86
Grade
D
69/100
Performance57/100
Structure86/100

13 audit(s) passed, 3 need work

First byte (TTFB)3.16 smeasured from this server
Fully loaded3.55 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests5document + assets
Page weight471.8 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document3.1 KBgzip
ProtocolHTTP/3server not sent
Third-party468.8 KBother hosts

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 36 ms 1%
  • TCP connect 1.25 s 39%
  • Server wait 1.87 s 59%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 99% of 4,999 pages tested here3.16 s against a median of 448 ms
Page weightlighter than 60% of 4,999 pages tested here471.8 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedslower than 86% of 4,999 pages tested here3.55 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 93% of 4,999 pages tested here5 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 3.16 s. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 471.8 KB over 5 request(s), which is lean. Javascript files are 95% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • 99% of the weight comes from other hosts (analytics, fonts, embeds), which also means their slow day becomes your slow day.
  • The largest element took 2.54 s to paint, past the 2.5 s threshold: usually a hero image that is too big or a render-blocking script in front of it.
  • Layout stayed still (CLS 0.002), so nothing jumps under the reader's cursor.
  • The main thread was blocked for 205 ms, so taps and scrolling wait while scripts run.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of www.wps.cn
Mobile 390 × 844 · 193.1 KB · page is 844 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint2.54 sgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.002under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time205 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint1.78 sfirst content on screen
Browser page weight1.26 MB30 request(s), scripts included
Failed requests1blocked or unreachable
Largest contentful paint2.54 s
Needs improvementgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.002
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time205 ms
Needs improvementgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 3 requests
450.3 KB 95%
Css 1 request
18.5 KB 4%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 5 request(s) in total, 471.8 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 3158 ms. Of that, 1874 ms was the server thinking and 1283 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Third-party weight

medium impact

2 third-party host(s) serve 468.8 KB of this page. Each one is another DNS lookup, TLS handshake and point of failure you do not control.

Fix: Self-host the libraries you can, drop the tags you cannot justify, and preconnect the ones you keep.

Avoid extra redirects

medium impact

1 redirect hop(s) before the page load started, each one a full round trip before the first byte.

Fix: Link to the canonical URL (and make sure http, the apex domain and www all point at it) so no visitor pays a redirect first.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

JAVASCRIPTvolcengine-kdocs-cache.wpscdn.cn/kdocs/js/official.e9c31a5b.js
396 ms
JAVASCRIPTvolcengine-kdocs-cache.wpscdn.cn/kdocs/js/chunk-common.06359509.js
360 ms
CSSvolcengine-kdocs-cache.wpscdn.cn/kdocs/css/official.b78d116e.css
335 ms
JAVASCRIPTwww.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js
133 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://volcengine-kdocs-cache.wpscdn.cn/kdocs/js/official.e9c31a5b.js 3rd partyjavascript200396 ms128.9 KB
https://volcengine-kdocs-cache.wpscdn.cn/kdocs/js/chunk-common.06359509.js 3rd partyjavascript200360 ms145.2 KB
https://volcengine-kdocs-cache.wpscdn.cn/kdocs/css/official.b78d116e.css 3rd partycss200335 ms18.5 KB
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-W83RBCMGFV 3rd partyjavascript200133 ms176.2 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.