jumpjump.io speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 13:57 UTC. Grade A (91/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://jumpjump.io/

20 October 2026 at 13:57 UTC · Free test · report pt_a822fb42d96c
Grade
A
91/100
Performance93/100
Structure89/100

13 audit(s) passed, 3 need work

First byte (TTFB)450 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded827 msfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests5document + assets
Page weight505.4 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document790 Bzstd
ProtocolHTTP/3cloudflare
Third-party190.4 KBother hosts

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 63 ms 14%
  • TCP connect 15 ms 3%
  • Server wait 371 ms 82%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First bytefaster than 50% of 4,999 pages tested here450 ms against a median of 448 ms
Page weightlighter than 58% of 4,999 pages tested here505.4 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 94% of 4,999 pages tested here827 ms against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 93% of 4,999 pages tested here5 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte arrived in 450 ms. That is workable, and the cheapest win left is caching or a warmer connection.
  • The page transfers 505.4 KB over 5 request(s), which is lean. Javascript files are 91% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives zstd-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • 38% of the weight comes from other hosts (analytics, fonts, embeds), which also means their slow day becomes your slow day.
  • The largest element painted at 1.56 s, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • The main thread was blocked for 125 ms in total, which is not enough to feel.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Desktop screenshot of jumpjump.io
Desktop 1366 × 768 · 292.6 KB · page is 768 px tall
Mobile screenshot of jumpjump.io
Mobile 390 × 844 · 123.2 KB · page is 844 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint1.56 sgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time125 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint1.45 sfirst content on screen
Browser page weight773.3 KB28 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paint1.56 s
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time125 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 2 requests
457.4 KB 91%
Css 1 request
24.2 KB 5%
Images 1 request
23.0 KB 5%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 5 request(s) in total, 505.4 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 450 ms. Of that, 371 ms was the server thinking and 78 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

JavaScript weight

medium impact

1 JavaScript file(s) over 200 KB: index-43113bdf.js (267.0 KB)

Fix: Split routes, remove unused dependencies, and prefer a two-file build (one pinned library, one application bundle) over many small ones.

Strict-Transport-Security

low impact

HSTS is not set, so the first visit on a hostile network can still be downgraded to HTTP.

Fix: Send Strict-Transport-Security with a max-age of at least six months. Add includeSubDomains once every subdomain is HTTPS.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

JAVASCRIPTwww.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js
377 ms
CSSjumpjump.io/static/css/index-07ca6a67.css
274 ms
JAVASCRIPTjumpjump.io/static/js/index-43113bdf.js
198 ms
IMAGESjumpjump.io/favicon.ico
197 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-YPFQ8C22LR 3rd partyjavascript200377 ms190.4 KB
https://jumpjump.io/static/css/index-07ca6a67.csscss200274 ms24.2 KB
https://jumpjump.io/static/js/index-43113bdf.jsjavascript200198 ms267.0 KB
https://jumpjump.io/favicon.icoimages200197 ms23.0 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.