crushblocks.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 16:10 UTC. Grade A (93/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://crushblocks.com/

20 October 2026 at 16:10 UTC · Free test · report pt_aa3e3f18d029
Grade
A
93/100
Performance94/100
Structure92/100

14 audit(s) passed, 2 need work

First byte (TTFB)411 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded884 msfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests4document + assets
Page weight167.8 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document1.6 KBgzip
ProtocolHTTP/3nginx

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 101 ms 25%
  • TCP connect 88 ms 21%
  • Server wait 222 ms 54%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First bytefaster than 55% of 4,999 pages tested here411 ms against a median of 449 ms
Page weightlighter than 82% of 4,999 pages tested here167.8 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 94% of 4,999 pages tested here884 ms against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 94% of 4,999 pages tested here4 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte arrived in 411 ms. That is workable, and the cheapest win left is caching or a warmer connection.
  • The page transfers 167.8 KB over 4 request(s), which is lean. Javascript files are 94% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 1.24 s, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • The main thread was blocked for 12 ms in total, which is not enough to feel.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of crushblocks.com
Mobile 390 × 844 · 203.2 KB · page is 844 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint1.24 sgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time12 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint804 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight3.22 MB17 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paint1.24 s
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time12 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 2 requests
158.5 KB 94%
Css 1 request
7.7 KB 5%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 4 request(s) in total, 167.8 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 411 ms. Of that, 222 ms was the server thinking and 189 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Strict-Transport-Security

low impact

HSTS is not set, so the first visit on a hostile network can still be downgraded to HTTP.

Fix: Send Strict-Transport-Security with a max-age of at least six months. Add includeSubDomains once every subdomain is HTTPS.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

JAVASCRIPTcrushblocks.com/assets/index.78f11ac4.js
473 ms
CSScrushblocks.com/assets/index.b1ca779a.css
451 ms
JAVASCRIPTcrushblocks.com/assets/polyfills-legacy.5fcb6679.js
415 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://crushblocks.com/assets/index.78f11ac4.jsjavascript200473 ms118.6 KB
https://crushblocks.com/assets/index.b1ca779a.csscss200451 ms7.7 KB
https://crushblocks.com/assets/polyfills-legacy.5fcb6679.jsjavascript200415 ms39.9 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.