www.pozdravok.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 15:56 UTC. Grade B (87/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://www.pozdravok.com/

20 October 2026 at 15:56 UTC · Free test · report pt_baa42ac4f170
Grade
B
87/100
Performance83/100
Structure94/100

14 audit(s) passed, 2 need work

First byte (TTFB)707 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded2.43 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests13document + assets
Page weight81.4 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document4.1 KBbr
ProtocolHTTP/3nginx

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 95 ms 13%
  • TCP connect 188 ms 27%
  • Server wait 425 ms 60%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 70% of 4,999 pages tested here707 ms against a median of 448 ms
Page weightlighter than 89% of 4,999 pages tested here81.4 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedslower than 72% of 4,999 pages tested here2.43 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 85% of 4,999 pages tested here13 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 707 ms. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 81.4 KB over 13 request(s), which is lean. Images files are 79% of it, so resize and recompress the largest images before anything else.
  • The HTML itself arrives br-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 1.11 s, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of www.pozdravok.com
Mobile 390 × 844 · 128.5 KB · page is 3725 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint1.11 sgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking timenone over 50 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint884 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight125.3 KB20 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paint1.11 s
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking timenone over 50 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Images 9 requests
64.2 KB 79%
Javascript 1 request
7.5 KB 9%
Css 1 request
4.3 KB 5%
Other 1 request
1.3 KB 2%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 13 request(s) in total, 81.4 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 707 ms. Of that, 425 ms was the server thinking and 283 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Avoid extra redirects

medium impact

1 redirect hop(s) before the page load started, each one a full round trip before the first byte.

Fix: Link to the canonical URL (and make sure http, the apex domain and www all point at it) so no visitor pays a redirect first.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

IMAGESwww.pozdravok.com/pic/icon-180.png
1.72 s
IMAGESwww.pozdravok.com/pic/icons2.png
1.05 s
CSSwww.pozdravok.com/main.css
1.01 s
IMAGESwww.pozdravok.com/pic/logo.webp
971 ms
JAVASCRIPTwww.pozdravok.com/script.js
936 ms
IMAGESwww.pozdravok.com/cards/prazdniki/pozdravok_ru.gif
885 ms
IMAGESwww.pozdravok.com/pic/vinni-puh.gif
870 ms
IMAGESwww.pozdravok.com/pic/vinni-puh2x.gif
868 ms
IMAGESwww.pozdravok.com/pic/logo.png
864 ms
IMAGESwww.pozdravok.com/pic/logo2x.png
859 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://www.pozdravok.com/pic/icon-180.pngimages2001.72 s4.7 KB
https://www.pozdravok.com/pic/icons2.pngimages2001.05 s1.3 KB
https://www.pozdravok.com/main.csscss2001.01 s4.3 KB
https://www.pozdravok.com/pic/logo.webpimages200971 ms3.5 KB
https://www.pozdravok.com/script.jsjavascript200936 ms7.5 KB
https://www.pozdravok.com/cards/prazdniki/pozdravok_ru.gifimages200885 ms29.3 KB
https://www.pozdravok.com/pic/vinni-puh.gifimages200870 ms2.9 KB
https://www.pozdravok.com/pic/vinni-puh2x.gifimages200868 ms5.8 KB
https://www.pozdravok.com/pic/logo.pngimages200864 ms4.7 KB
https://www.pozdravok.com/pic/logo2x.pngimages200859 ms11.8 KB
https://www.pozdravok.com/manifest.webmanifestother200854 ms1.3 KB
https://www.pozdravok.com/favicon.icoimages200854 ms212 B
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.