ts.net speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 14:14 UTC. Grade A (94/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://ts.net/

20 October 2026 at 14:14 UTC · Free test · report pt_c2a5473a7788
Grade
A
94/100
Performance94/100
Structure95/100

15 audit(s) passed, 1 need work

First byte (TTFB)426 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded1.09 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests12document + assets
Page weight342.0 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document3.0 KBbr
ProtocolHTTP/3Vercel

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 65 ms 15%
  • TCP connect 72 ms 17%
  • Server wait 289 ms 68%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First bytefaster than 53% of 4,999 pages tested here426 ms against a median of 449 ms
Page weightlighter than 69% of 4,999 pages tested here342.0 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 90% of 4,999 pages tested here1.09 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 86% of 4,999 pages tested here12 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte arrived in 426 ms. That is workable, and the cheapest win left is caching or a warmer connection.
  • The page transfers 342.0 KB over 12 request(s), which is lean. Javascript files are 51% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives br-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 484 ms, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • The main thread was blocked for 218 ms, so taps and scrolling wait while scripts run.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of ts.net
Mobile 390 × 844 · 24.7 KB · page is 844 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint484 msgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time218 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint484 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight1.85 MB58 request(s), scripts included
Failed requests8blocked or unreachable
Largest contentful paint484 ms
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time218 ms
Needs improvementgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 8 requests
175.6 KB 51%
Fonts 2 requests
127.7 KB 37%
Css 1 request
35.7 KB 10%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 12 request(s) in total, 342.0 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 426 ms. Of that, 289 ms was the server thinking and 137 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

JAVASCRIPTts.net/_next/static/chunks/pages/tsnet-0e4755…
667 ms
JAVASCRIPTts.net/_next/static/_hnyJ0YbkZyVduDRnJ5A0/_bu…
653 ms
JAVASCRIPTts.net/_next/static/chunks/main-fc51a042ada8f…
598 ms
JAVASCRIPTts.net/_next/static/chunks/framework-5c59b3fa…
576 ms
JAVASCRIPTts.net/_next/static/chunks/webpack-ec7c0071f5…
575 ms
JAVASCRIPTts.net/_next/static/chunks/pages/_app-91c6ece…
551 ms
CSSts.net/_next/static/css/6021888b84498bff.css
547 ms
JAVASCRIPTts.net/_next/static/_hnyJ0YbkZyVduDRnJ5A0/_ss…
536 ms
JAVASCRIPTts.net/_next/static/chunks/polyfills-42372ed1…
534 ms
FONTSts.net/_next/static/media/e4af272ccee01ff0-s.…
531 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://ts.net/_next/static/chunks/pages/tsnet-0e47551ac6197e6f.jsjavascript200667 ms2.6 KB
https://ts.net/_next/static/_hnyJ0YbkZyVduDRnJ5A0/_buildManifest.jsjavascript200653 ms1.9 KB
https://ts.net/_next/static/chunks/main-fc51a042ada8f325.jsjavascript200598 ms39.5 KB
https://ts.net/_next/static/chunks/framework-5c59b3faca784f4c.jsjavascript200576 ms45.4 KB
https://ts.net/_next/static/chunks/webpack-ec7c0071f504a9a2.jsjavascript200575 ms35.2 KB
https://ts.net/_next/static/chunks/pages/_app-91c6eceda888de5b.jsjavascript200551 ms10.3 KB
https://ts.net/_next/static/css/6021888b84498bff.csscss200547 ms35.7 KB
https://ts.net/_next/static/_hnyJ0YbkZyVduDRnJ5A0/_ssgManifest.jsjavascript200536 ms414 B
https://ts.net/_next/static/chunks/polyfills-42372ed130431b0a.jsjavascript200534 ms40.4 KB
https://ts.net/_next/static/media/e4af272ccee01ff0-s.p.woff2fonts200531 ms47.3 KB
https://ts.net/_next/static/media/97a52bce187043ec-s.p.woff2fonts200529 ms80.4 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.