mixi.jp speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 14:51 UTC. Grade C (77/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://mixi.jp/

20 October 2026 at 14:51 UTC · Free test · report pt_c7528033ff54
Grade
C
77/100
Performance79/100
Structure74/100

11 audit(s) passed, 5 need work

First byte (TTFB)859 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded2.35 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests26document + assets
Page weight557.0 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document8.5 KBgzip
ProtocolHTTP/2Apache
Third-party548.5 KBother hosts

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 52 ms 6%
  • TCP connect 162 ms 19%
  • Server wait 644 ms 75%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 79% of 4,999 pages tested here859 ms against a median of 448 ms
Page weightlighter than 55% of 4,999 pages tested here557.0 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedslower than 70% of 4,999 pages tested here2.35 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends more requests than 100% of 4,999 pages tested here26 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 859 ms. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 557.0 KB over 26 request(s). Javascript files are 51% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/2, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • 98% of the weight comes from other hosts (analytics, fonts, embeds), which also means their slow day becomes your slow day.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

No screenshot for this report.

The headless browser did not capture this page when the test ran, so only the server measurements are shown.

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 11 requests
285.8 KB 51%
Images 14 requests
262.7 KB 47%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 26 request(s) in total, 557.0 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 859 ms. Of that, 644 ms was the server thinking and 214 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Render-blocking resources

high impact

11 render-blocking resource(s) in the document head (10 script(s), 1 stylesheet(s)). The page cannot paint until each one arrives.

Fix: Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Cache static assets

medium impact

5 asset(s) answer without a Cache-Control max-age, so browsers revalidate them on every visit.

Fix: Version filenames on change and serve them with a long max-age plus immutable. That is what makes a returning visitor fast.

Third-party weight

medium impact

5 third-party host(s) serve 548.5 KB of this page. Each one is another DNS lookup, TLS handshake and point of failure you do not control.

Fix: Self-host the libraries you can, drop the tags you cannot justify, and preconnect the ones you keep.

Mobile viewport

medium impact

No viewport meta tag, so a phone renders the desktop layout scaled down.

Fix: Add a viewport meta tag with width=device-width and an initial scale of 1.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

JAVASCRIPTscript.mixi.net/static/js/lib/disable-double-submit.js
1.49 s
JAVASCRIPTscript.mixi.net/static/polyfill/core-js/core-js-mixi-c…
1.47 s
JAVASCRIPTscript.mixi.net/static/js/build/mixi-qa-error-report.p…
1.47 s
JAVASCRIPTscript.mixi.net/static/js/lib/mixi-customized-prototyp…
1.45 s
JAVASCRIPTscript.mixi.net/static/polyfill/classList/classList-1.…
1.45 s
JAVASCRIPTscript.mixi.net/static/js/lib/namespace-1.0.1-brook-co…
1.44 s
JAVASCRIPTscript.mixi.net/static/polyfill/datalist-polyfill/data…
1.43 s
JAVASCRIPTscript.mixi.net/static/js/lib/lodash-underscore-string…
1.43 s
JAVASCRIPTscript.mixi.net/static/polyfill/element-remove/element…
1.42 s
JAVASCRIPTscript.mixi.net/static/polyfill/fetch/fetch-3.6.2.js
1.42 s

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://script.mixi.net/static/js/lib/disable-double-submit.js?1666153536 3rd partyjavascript2001.49 s836 B
https://script.mixi.net/static/polyfill/core-js/core-js-mixi-custom.min.js?1741065834 3rd partyjavascript2001.47 s43.5 KB
https://script.mixi.net/static/js/build/mixi-qa-error-report.production.js?1788503164 3rd partyjavascript2001.47 s4.5 KB
https://script.mixi.net/static/js/lib/mixi-customized-prototype-effects.js?1695607468 3rd partyjavascript2001.45 s25.1 KB
https://script.mixi.net/static/polyfill/classList/classList-1.2.20180112.min.js?1669591537 3rd partyjavascript2001.45 s1.1 KB
https://script.mixi.net/static/js/lib/namespace-1.0.1-brook-compress.js?1788503201 3rd partyjavascript2001.44 s13.7 KB
https://script.mixi.net/static/polyfill/datalist-polyfill/datalist-polyfill-1.24.3.js?1514732400 3rd partyjavascript2001.43 s2.6 KB
https://script.mixi.net/static/js/lib/lodash-underscore-string-4.17.21-2.0.0-compress.js?1788503200 3rd partyjavascript2001.43 s26.9 KB
https://script.mixi.net/static/polyfill/element-remove/element-remove-1.0.4.js?1625436464 3rd partyjavascript2001.42 s434 B
https://script.mixi.net/static/polyfill/fetch/fetch-3.6.2.js?1669257865 3rd partyjavascript2001.42 s4.9 KB
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-5YESPFKH53 3rd partyjavascript2001.24 s162.3 KB
https://img.mixi.net/img/basic/icon/logo_mixi001.svg 3rd partyimages2001.16 s2.2 KB
https://logo-imagecluster.img.mixi.jp/photo/comm/6/52/990652_9.gif 3rd partyimages2001.10 s56.7 KB
https://logo-imagecluster.img.mixi.jp/photo/comm/34/69/5793469_215.jpg 3rd partyimages2001.10 s54.7 KB
https://logo-imagecluster.img.mixi.jp/photo/comm/6/10/6360610_161.jpg 3rd partyimages2001.10 s22.9 KB
https://logo-imagecluster.img.mixi.jp/photo/comm/65/15/6366515_152.jpg 3rd partyimages2001.10 s22.2 KB
https://logo-imagecluster.img.mixi.jp/photo/comm/93/47/6319347_194.jpg 3rd partyimages2001.10 s9.6 KB
https://logo-imagecluster.img.mixi.jp/photo/comm/71/97/77197_247.jpg 3rd partyimages2001.10 s4.1 KB
https://logo-imagecluster.img.mixi.jp/photo/comm/42/23/124223_109.gif 3rd partyimages2001.10 s3.6 KB
https://img.mixi.net/img/news_new3.gif 3rd partyimages2001.10 s104 B
https://news-image.mixi.net/article/54/54_20261020_2487467_002_160x160.jpg 3rd partyimages2001.10 s8.3 KB
https://news-image.mixi.net/article/235/235_20261020_44178_3_160x160.jpg 3rd partyimages2001.10 s4.0 KB
https://img.mixi.net/img/public/pc/icon/photoup001.gif 3rd partyimages2001.10 s1.8 KB
https://logo-imagecluster.img.mixi.jp/photo/comm/51/35/45135_242.gif 3rd partyimages2001.05 s64.4 KB
https://logo-imagecluster.img.mixi.jp/photo/comm/38/94/6383894_172.png 3rd partyimages2001.05 s7.9 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.