pornolab.net speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 15:45 UTC. Grade A (90/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://pornolab.net/

20 October 2026 at 15:45 UTC · Free test · report pt_c7fa134e0599
Grade
A
90/100
Performance89/100
Structure92/100

14 audit(s) passed, 2 need work

First byte (TTFB)627 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded627 msfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests1document + assets
Page weight516 Bcompressed transfer
HTML document516 Bno compression
ProtocolHTTP/3nginx

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 61 ms 10%
  • TCP connect 174 ms 28%
  • Server wait 392 ms 63%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 65% of 4,999 pages tested here627 ms against a median of 448 ms
Page weightlighter than 98% of 4,999 pages tested here516 B against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 97% of 4,999 pages tested here627 ms against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 98% of 4,999 pages tested here1 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 627 ms. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 516 B over 1 request(s), which is lean.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 1.33 s, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • Layout shift is 0.266 (good is under 0.1): something without a reserved size is loading late - an image, an ad, or a font swap.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of pornolab.net
Mobile 390 × 844 · 109.4 KB · page is 4350 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint1.33 sgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.266under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking timenone over 50 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint940 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight1.38 MB40 request(s), scripts included
Failed requests5blocked or unreachable
Largest contentful paint1.33 s
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.266
Poorgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking timenone over 50 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 627 ms. Of that, 392 ms was the server thinking and 235 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Mobile viewport

medium impact

No viewport meta tag, so a phone renders the desktop layout scaled down.

Fix: Add a viewport meta tag with width=device-width and an initial scale of 1.

Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.