www.booking.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 13:22 UTC. Grade B (88/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://www.booking.com/

20 October 2026 at 13:22 UTC · Free test · report pt_d19d7a67868a
Grade
B
88/100
Performance92/100
Structure83/100

11 audit(s) passed, 5 need work

First byte (TTFB)498 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded1.09 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests3document + assets
Page weight810.1 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document3.9 KBno compression
ProtocolHTTP/3nginx

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 96 ms 19%
  • TCP connect 36 ms 7%
  • Server wait 366 ms 73%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 55% of 4,999 pages tested here498 ms against a median of 448 ms
Page weightheavier than 57% of 4,999 pages tested here810.1 KB against a median of 650.3 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 90% of 4,999 pages tested here1.09 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 95% of 4,999 pages tested here3 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte arrived in 498 ms. That is workable, and the cheapest win left is caching or a warmer connection.
  • The page transfers 810.1 KB over 3 request(s), which is lean. Javascript files are 83% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The main thread was blocked for 133 ms in total, which is not enough to feel.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Desktop screenshot of www.booking.com
Desktop 1366 × 768 · 821.6 KB · page is 3902 px tall
Mobile screenshot of www.booking.com
Mobile 390 × 844 · 221.5 KB · page is 844 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paintnot reportedgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time133 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint1.19 sfirst content on screen
Browser page weight3.92 MB124 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paintnot reported
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time133 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 1 request
675.1 KB 83%
Html 1 request
131.2 KB 16%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 3 request(s) in total, 810.1 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 498 ms. Of that, 366 ms was the server thinking and 132 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Compress text responses

high impact

2 text response(s) of 10 KB or more are sent uncompressed, and the document itself is not compressed. That is 806.2 KB of compressible text.

Fix: Turn on brotli (preferred) or gzip for text/css, javascript and text/html in the web server. This is the cheapest win available on almost any site.

Cache static assets

medium impact

1 asset(s) answer without a Cache-Control max-age, so browsers revalidate them on every visit.

Fix: Version filenames on change and serve them with a long max-age plus immutable. That is what makes a returning visitor fast.

JavaScript weight

medium impact

1 JavaScript file(s) over 200 KB: challenge.js (675.1 KB)

Fix: Split routes, remove unused dependencies, and prefer a two-file build (one pinned library, one application bundle) over many small ones.

Avoid extra redirects

medium impact

1 redirect hop(s) before the page load started, each one a full round trip before the first byte.

Fix: Link to the canonical URL (and make sure http, the apex domain and www all point at it) so no visitor pays a redirect first.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

HTMLwww.booking.com/referrer
595 ms
JAVASCRIPTwww.booking.com/__challenge_h78IRKX3kpQxScCExxShBNwRUl…
396 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://www.booking.com/referrerhtml200595 ms131.2 KB
https://www.booking.com/__challenge_h78IRKX3kpQxScCExxShBNwRUlb/d8c14d4960ca/a18a4859af9c/challenge.jsjavascript200396 ms675.1 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.