aliexpress.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 12:23 UTC. Grade B (80/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://aliexpress.com/

20 October 2026 at 12:23 UTC · Free test · report pt_d7c8211075a0
Grade
B
80/100
Performance76/100
Structure85/100

13 audit(s) passed, 3 need work

First byte (TTFB)1.09 smeasured from this server
Fully loaded1.09 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests1document + assets
Page weight843 Bcompressed transfer
HTML document843 Bgzip
ProtocolHTTP/3Tengine

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 58 ms 5%
  • TCP connect 246 ms 23%
  • Server wait 786 ms 72%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 88% of 4,999 pages tested here1.09 s against a median of 448 ms
Page weightlighter than 98% of 4,999 pages tested here843 B against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 90% of 4,999 pages tested here1.09 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 98% of 4,999 pages tested here1 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 1.09 s. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 843 B over 1 request(s), which is lean.
  • The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 1.82 s, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • Layout stayed still (CLS 0.018), so nothing jumps under the reader's cursor.
  • The main thread was blocked for 436 ms, so taps and scrolling wait while scripts run.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint1.82 sgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.018under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time436 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint1.56 sfirst content on screen
Browser page weight575.5 KB34 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paint1.82 s
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.018
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time436 ms
Needs improvementgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 1090 ms. Of that, 786 ms was the server thinking and 304 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Mobile viewport

medium impact

No viewport meta tag, so a phone renders the desktop layout scaled down.

Fix: Add a viewport meta tag with width=device-width and an initial scale of 1.

Strict-Transport-Security

low impact

HSTS is not set, so the first visit on a hostile network can still be downgraded to HTTP.

Fix: Send Strict-Transport-Security with a max-age of at least six months. Add includeSubDomains once every subdomain is HTTPS.

Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.