youronlinechoices.eu speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 13:31 UTC. Grade B (88/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://youronlinechoices.eu/

20 October 2026 at 13:31 UTC · Free test · report pt_f07169984a5f
Grade
B
88/100
Performance89/100
Structure86/100

14 audit(s) passed, 2 need work

First byte (TTFB)615 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded1.48 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests8document + assets
Page weight75.3 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document1.9 KBbr
ProtocolHTTP/3nginx-rc

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 57 ms 9%
  • TCP connect 132 ms 21%
  • Server wait 426 ms 69%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First byteslower than 64% of 4,999 pages tested here615 ms against a median of 448 ms
Page weightlighter than 89% of 4,999 pages tested here75.3 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 71% of 4,999 pages tested here1.48 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 90% of 4,999 pages tested here8 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte took 615 ms. Everything else waits for that number, so the server is where to start: caching, a slow query, or an overloaded host.
  • The page transfers 75.3 KB over 8 request(s), which is lean. Javascript files are 47% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives br-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 1.36 s, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.

Fix first: Server response time (TTFB) - Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Desktop screenshot of youronlinechoices.eu
Desktop 1366 × 768 · 309.2 KB · page is 1041 px tall
Mobile screenshot of youronlinechoices.eu
Mobile 390 × 844 · 134.8 KB · page is 1915 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint1.36 sgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking timenone over 50 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint1.11 sfirst content on screen
Browser page weight164.2 KB10 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paint1.36 s
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking timenone over 50 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 4 requests
35.7 KB 47%
Images 1 request
32.9 KB 44%
Css 2 requests
4.7 KB 6%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 8 request(s) in total, 75.3 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Server response time (TTFB)

high impact

The first byte arrived after 615 ms. Of that, 426 ms was the server thinking and 189 ms was connection setup. A first byte under 400 ms is what a visitor feels as instant.

Fix: Cut server think time: page cache, query indexes, fewer synchronous calls to third parties inside the request. Connection setup is distance, so a nearer region or a CDN edge helps instead.

Render-blocking resources

high impact

7 render-blocking resource(s) in the document head (4 script(s), 3 stylesheet(s)). The page cannot paint until each one arrives.

Fix: Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

JAVASCRIPTyouronlinechoices.eu/wp-content/plugins/optout/js/optout_te…
866 ms
CSSyouronlinechoices.eu/css/_base.css
810 ms
JAVASCRIPTyouronlinechoices.eu/javascript/hashslider.js
797 ms
JAVASCRIPTyouronlinechoices.eu/javascript/js.js
772 ms
JAVASCRIPTyouronlinechoices.eu/javascript/jquery-1.7.1.min.js
730 ms
IMAGESyouronlinechoices.eu/temp/hp-1.jpg
694 ms
CSSyouronlinechoices.eu/css/_style.css
690 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://youronlinechoices.eu/wp-content/plugins/optout/js/optout_testpage.jsjavascript200866 ms3.2 KB
https://youronlinechoices.eu/css/_base.csscss200810 ms2.6 KB
https://youronlinechoices.eu/javascript/hashslider.jsjavascript200797 ms1020 B
https://youronlinechoices.eu/javascript/js.jsjavascript200772 ms365 B
https://youronlinechoices.eu/javascript/jquery-1.7.1.min.jsjavascript200730 ms31.2 KB
https://youronlinechoices.eu/temp/hp-1.jpgimages200694 ms32.9 KB
https://youronlinechoices.eu/css/_style.csscss200690 ms2.1 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.