askubuntu.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 15:35 UTC. Grade A (93/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://askubuntu.com/

20 October 2026 at 15:35 UTC · Free test · report pt_fc46e8308ca9
Grade
A
93/100
Performance96/100
Structure88/100

14 audit(s) passed, 2 need work

First byte (TTFB)342 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded1.34 sfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests26document + assets
Page weight187.7 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document24.9 KBgzip
ProtocolHTTP/3cloudflare
Third-party83.8 KBother hosts

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 70 ms 20%
  • TCP connect 37 ms 11%
  • Server wait 235 ms 69%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First bytefaster than 66% of 4,999 pages tested here342 ms against a median of 449 ms
Page weightlighter than 80% of 4,999 pages tested here187.7 KB against a median of 650.5 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 81% of 4,999 pages tested here1.34 s against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends more requests than 100% of 4,999 pages tested here26 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The first byte arrived in 342 ms. That is workable, and the cheapest win left is caching or a warmer connection.
  • The page transfers 187.7 KB over 26 request(s). Javascript files are 74% of it, so defer what is not needed for the first screen, and drop tags nobody uses.
  • The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • 45% of the weight comes from other hosts (analytics, fonts, embeds), which also means their slow day becomes your slow day.
  • The largest element painted at 1.30 s, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • The main thread was blocked for 42 ms in total, which is not enough to feel.

Fix first: Render-blocking resources - Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Mobile screenshot of askubuntu.com
Mobile 390 × 844 · 72.9 KB · page is 3299 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint1.30 sgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking time42 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint720 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight989.5 KB62 request(s), scripts included
Failed requests2blocked or unreachable
Largest contentful paint1.30 s
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.000
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking time42 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Javascript 9 requests
138.6 KB 74%
Images 16 requests
24.3 KB 13%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 26 request(s) in total, 187.7 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Render-blocking resources

high impact

10 render-blocking resource(s) in the document head (7 script(s), 3 stylesheet(s)). The page cannot paint until each one arrives.

Fix: Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Third-party weight

low impact

5 third-party host(s) serve 83.8 KB of this page. Each one is another DNS lookup, TLS handshake and point of failure you do not control.

Fix: Self-host the libraries you can, drop the tags you cannot justify, and preconnect the ones you keep.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

IMAGESlh4.googleusercontent.com/-weQLu1Im8es/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAABEg/4…
993 ms
IMAGESlh4.googleusercontent.com/-NEE4W435Uls/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABQ/O…
971 ms
IMAGESi.sstatic.net/xNPjb.png
962 ms
JAVASCRIPTajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.7.1/jquery.min.js
920 ms
IMAGESwww.gravatar.com/avatar/fbaac339f7a2ac9bae3c8b26622a124c
920 ms
JAVASCRIPTcdn.cookielaw.org/scripttemplates/gpp.stub.js
907 ms
IMAGESwww.gravatar.com/avatar/9e263681488308e5e5d5e548b2f9bc99
905 ms
JAVASCRIPTcdn.cookielaw.org/scripttemplates/otSDKStub.js
893 ms
JAVASCRIPTaskubuntu.com/Content/Js/google-analytics.en.js
889 ms
IMAGESi.sstatic.net/8oLNV.jpg
868 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-weQLu1Im8es/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAABEg/4bXLPukGRgA/s32-rj/photo.jpg 3rd partyimages200993 ms1.0 KB
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-NEE4W435Uls/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABQ/O7vbrieGHWc/s32-rj/photo.jpg 3rd partyimages200971 ms1.0 KB
https://i.sstatic.net/xNPjb.png?s=32 3rd partyimages200962 ms1.1 KB
https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.7.1/jquery.min.js 3rd partyjavascript200920 ms29.7 KB
https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/fbaac339f7a2ac9bae3c8b26622a124c?s=32&d=identicon&r=PG&f=y&so-version=2 3rd partyimages200920 ms1010 B
https://cdn.cookielaw.org/scripttemplates/gpp.stub.js 3rd partyjavascript200907 ms27.7 KB
https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/9e263681488308e5e5d5e548b2f9bc99?s=32&d=identicon&r=PG 3rd partyimages200905 ms1.0 KB
https://cdn.cookielaw.org/scripttemplates/otSDKStub.js 3rd partyjavascript200893 ms13.6 KB
https://askubuntu.com/Content/Js/google-analytics.en.js?v=48615a9a9bc4javascript200889 ms2.3 KB
https://i.sstatic.net/8oLNV.jpg?s=32 3rd partyimages200868 ms636 B
https://askubuntu.com/Content/Sites/askubuntu/Img/logo.svg?v=472cf2768bbaimages200861 ms4.2 KB
https://askubuntu.com/Content/Img/stack-internal-left-tile-pinned.svg?v=16878b0d76c5images200861 ms4.1 KB
https://askubuntu.com/Content/Img/stack-internal-left-tile-drawer.svg?v=0056d71cd7e6images200861 ms3.2 KB
https://askubuntu.com/Content/Js/third-party/npm/@stackoverflow/stacks/dist/js/stacks.min.js?v=79a2fd33ef4bjavascript200860 ms30.5 KB
https://askubuntu.com/Content/Js/stub.en.js?v=c4a2a2be622djavascript200860 ms18.9 KB
https://askubuntu.com/Content/Js/home/index.en.js?v=38002111626ejavascript200860 ms14.0 KB
https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/15456f0f1c760e334cc75582d6ea1dda?s=32&d=identicon&r=PG&f=y&so-version=2 3rd partyimages200860 ms1.2 KB
https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/941c2d407892e1e8ff4f2da290d04c0c?s=32&d=identicon&r=PG&f=y&so-version=2 3rd partyimages200860 ms1.2 KB
https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/86ca07b9ac1d96fb9a9bda0e45b9973b?s=32&d=identicon&r=PG&f=y&so-version=2 3rd partyimages200860 ms1.1 KB
https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/072e8511b51c9a224c0f6f34d58f6ada?s=32&d=identicon&r=PG&f=y&so-version=2 3rd partyimages200860 ms1.1 KB
https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/a658b8d7d40a210f03e5913ba1e3f939?s=32&d=identicon&r=PG&f=y&so-version=2 3rd partyimages200860 ms1.0 KB
https://askubuntu.com/Content/Js/webpack-chunks/5102.en.js?v=1e6c2976e394javascript200860 ms977 B
https://askubuntu.com/Content/Js/sprinkles/cookie-consent.en.js?v=7ee6963139c5javascript200860 ms815 B
https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/f43ebea01a6f92f6d117798d146c9ed4?s=32&d=identicon&r=PG 3rd partyimages200860 ms756 B
https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/a007be5a61f6aa8f3e85ae2fc18dd66e?s=32&d=identicon&r=PG 3rd partyimages200860 ms499 B
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.