lijit.com speed test — 20 Oct 2026

Measured from the wfix.shop server on 20 October 2026 at 12:26 UTC. Grade A (91/100), with the screenshots, the timings and the fixes that matter.

https://lijit.com/

20 October 2026 at 12:26 UTC · Free test · report pt_fd99924181bb
Grade
A
91/100
Performance100/100
Structure77/100

12 audit(s) passed, 4 need work

First byte (TTFB)146 msmeasured from this server
Fully loaded858 msfirst byte + slowest asset
Requests9document + assets
Page weight717.0 KBcompressed transfer
HTML document1.1 KBgzip
ProtocolHTTP/3AmazonS3

Where the first byte went

  • DNS lookup 44 ms 30%
  • TCP connect 23 ms 16%
  • Server wait 79 ms 54%

Measured on the connection that fetched the HTML. Every other request on the page waits for the end of this bar before it can start.

How this page compares

First bytefaster than 98% of 4,999 pages tested here146 ms against a median of 449 ms
Page weightheavier than 53% of 4,999 pages tested here717.0 KB against a median of 650.3 KB
Fully loadedfaster than 94% of 4,999 pages tested here858 ms against a median of 1.84 s
Requestssends fewer requests than 89% of 4,999 pages tested here9 against a median of 26

Every report published here is in this comparison, so it is a reference population of pages tested from one server - not a benchmark of the whole web.

What these numbers mean

  • The server answered in 146 ms, which is fast: almost all of the wait is the page itself, not the host.
  • The page transfers 717.0 KB over 9 request(s), which is lean. Images files are 93% of it, so resize and recompress the largest images before anything else.
  • The HTML itself arrives gzip-compressed.
  • It runs over HTTP/3, so the assets share a connection instead of opening one each.
  • The largest element painted at 476 ms, inside the 2.5 s Google calls good.
  • Layout stayed still (CLS 0.006), so nothing jumps under the reader's cursor.

Fix first: Image delivery and format - Serve WebP or AVIF with a JPEG fallback, size images to the space they occupy, and lazy-load anything below the fold. Images are usually more than half of a slow page.

Read on one shared server, not a visitor's phone: use it to compare pages against each other, not as a promise about every connection. We fix what these tests find.

Screenshot

What the page looks like

Loaded in headless Chromium on this server. Click an image to open it full size.

Desktop screenshot of lijit.com
Desktop 1366 × 768 · 164.3 KB · page is 792 px tall
Mobile screenshot of lijit.com
Mobile 390 × 844 · 115.9 KB · page is 957 px tall

Browser render

The same URL loaded in a real browser, so these are the readings curl cannot produce. The grade above is still built from the server measurements.

Largest contentful paint476 msgood is under 2.5 s
Cumulative layout shift0.006under 0.1 is stable
Total blocking timenone over 50 mslong tasks during load
First contentful paint388 msfirst content on screen
Browser page weight824.4 KB10 request(s), scripts included
Largest contentful paint476 ms
Goodgood under 2.5 s, poor over 4 s
Cumulative layout shift0.006
Goodgood under 0.1, poor over 0.25
Total blocking timenone over 50 ms
Goodgood under 200 ms, poor over 600 ms

Page weight by type

What the page is made of

Images 4 requests
664.2 KB 93%
Css 3 requests
26.8 KB 4%
Javascript 1 request
24.8 KB 3%

Transfer size, compressed as sent. 9 request(s) in total, 717.0 KB across all of them.

Top issues

Image delivery and format

high impact

1 image(s) over 200 KB and 1 large image(s) still served as JPEG or PNG.

Fix: Serve WebP or AVIF with a JPEG fallback, size images to the space they occupy, and lazy-load anything below the fold. Images are usually more than half of a slow page.

Render-blocking resources

high impact

3 render-blocking resource(s) in the document head (0 script(s), 3 stylesheet(s)). The page cannot paint until each one arrives.

Fix: Add defer or async to scripts that do not change the first paint, inline the critical CSS, and load the rest with media="print" plus an onload swap.

Cache static assets

medium impact

8 asset(s) answer without a Cache-Control max-age, so browsers revalidate them on every visit.

Fix: Version filenames on change and serve them with a long max-age plus immutable. That is what makes a returning visitor fast.

Strict-Transport-Security

low impact

HSTS is not set, so the first visit on a hostile network can still be downgraded to HTTP.

Fix: Send Strict-Transport-Security with a max-age of at least six months. Add includeSubDomains once every subdomain is HTTPS.

Waterfall

Slowest requests

CSSlijit.com/css/responsive.css
712 ms
IMAGESlijit.com/img/tool.png
675 ms
CSSlijit.com/css/bootstrap.css
666 ms
CSSlijit.com/style.css
663 ms
IMAGESlijit.com/img/Slashes.png
653 ms
IMAGESlijit.com/img/favicon.ico
653 ms
JAVASCRIPTlijit.com/js/bootstrap.js
650 ms
IMAGESlijit.com/img/logo.png
622 ms

Each bar is one request's own response time, scaled to the slowest. Assets were fetched in parallel, so the bars overlap in real time rather than stacking. first party third party

RequestTypeStatusTimeSize
https://lijit.com/css/responsive.csscss200712 ms665 B
https://lijit.com/img/tool.pngimages200675 ms609.2 KB
https://lijit.com/css/bootstrap.csscss200666 ms25.0 KB
https://lijit.com/style.csscss200663 ms1.2 KB
https://lijit.com/img/Slashes.pngimages200653 ms38.7 KB
https://lijit.com/img/favicon.icoimages200653 ms2.4 KB
https://lijit.com/js/bootstrap.jsjavascript200650 ms24.8 KB
https://lijit.com/img/logo.pngimages200622 ms14.0 KB
Report this page

The page is removed when the owner agrees. Sending this removes nothing by itself.

Run this test on your own site

The same engine, free, with the screenshots and the fixes. No account needed.